Legal Opinion

Bruce v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1915No. 3533PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by John L. Bruce, for partition of real estate, against Rosa McIntosh or Starr and Lee A. Voorhees; cross-petition by Voorhees claiming title to all of same. Judgment for defendant Voorhees, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant in the trial eourt. In October, 1909, Nathaniel McIntosh, “a newborn Creek Indian', enrolled as No. 1131,” at the age of five years, died intestate and seised and possessed of the following described allotted land in Hughes county, Okla., to wit:

“The southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the east half of the southeast quarter, all in section one (1) township nine (9) north, range thirteen (13) east.”

Greeley McIntosh, his father, and Rosa McIntosh, his mother, survived…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christy v. PulliamIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Alfred v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Board of Com'rs of Woodward County v. ThyfaultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Elwell v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Ezzard v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Union Savings Ass'n v. CumminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Choctaw Lumber Co. v. WaldockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. In Re Will of StiresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Maney & Alley v. FletcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. City of Enid v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API