Legal Opinion

Riden v. Grimm Bros.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. John A. Moon, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWiLKES, J.

This is a suit for damages sustained by the plaintiff in the death of her husband. Defendants demurred to the declaration filed, which was sustained and the suit dismissed, and plaintiff has appealed and assigned errors.

The declaration alleges that defendants were saloon keepers or retail dealers in liquors in Chattanooga; that her husband, W. H. Riden, had become an habitual drunkard, and this fact was well known to defendants; that, on May 29, 1894, the defendants were duly and lawfully served with written notice not to sell W. H. Riden anything to drink in their saloon, and were forbidden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Egbert v. GreenwaltMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Mahady v. . Bushwick Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Gifford v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Larson v. FurlongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Potter v. President of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Chattanooga Station Co. v. HarperTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Little v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  5. Rhea County v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API