Legal Opinion

Barnett Anchor Oil Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 29, 1932No. Docket No. 30994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*751OPINION.

Matthews:

The petitioner concedes that the respondent’s allowance for depletion on the oil lease in the amount of $209,243.73 for 1923, computed on the basis of its fair market value at the time acquired, as far as income for that year is concerned, is correct. In view of the fact that such computation is in accordance with the statute, we affirm the respondent’s determination of the deficiency for that year. We then have to decide the correct amount of depletion deductible from income for 1924 and 1925 and the amount of profit sustained on the sale of the petitioner’s 70 per cent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  2. Barnett Anchor Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  3. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Schweitzer & Conrad, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API