Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dudley v. Bland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil-Action upon a Guardian Bond, tried at Spring Term,. 1880, of Pitt Superior Court, before Avery, J. The case was heard upon complaint and answer, and the exceptions to a referee’s report. The facts necessary to an understanding of the decision of this court are stated in its opinion. The defendants appealed from the ruling and judgment of the court below.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The object of the suit is the recovery of the relator’s estate in the hands of his guardian, the defendant Theophilus Bland, and the action is against him and the sureties to his several bonds. During his'administration of the trust the guardian executed four successive bonds, as follows:

One August 2,1859, in the penal sum of $800, with Benjamin Hazzleton, testator of the defendant Phil. Williams, and the defendant W. A. Quinerly, his sureties. A second February 4, 1862, in the penalty of $9,000, with Jesse Nobles, the intestate of the defendant Fred. Harding, and Guil-ford Smith, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell v. . AddertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Craven v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Smith v. Richards.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Wharton v. . WoodburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API