Legal Opinion

Christodoulou v. Christodoulou

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred. On a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on statute of limitations grounds, the moving defendant must establish, prima facie, that the time in which to commence the action has expired. The burden then shifts to the plaintiff to raise an issue *784of fact as to whether the statute of limitations is tolled or is otherwise inapplicable (see Baptiste v Harding-Marin, 88 AD3d 752 [2d Dept 2011]; Rakusin v Miano, 84 AD3d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baptiste v. Harding-MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Rakusin v. MianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Mattera v. MatteraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Chung v. WangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Zane v. MinionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yang v. Oceanside Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API