Legal Opinion
Jae Kim, Fannin Food Mart, Inc., and the Real Property Known as 2111 Fannin Street v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided December 10, 2014No. 01-13-01083-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.
The State of Texas brought an action against Jae Kim, Fannin Food Mart, Inc., and The Real Property Known as 2111 Fannin Street (collectively, “the Fannin Parties”), asserting a common nuisance claim. The State obtained a permanent injunction against the Fannin Parties aimed at reducing crime occurring on and around the property. In six issues, the Fannin Parties assert (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the final judgment, (2) certain provisions of the relevant statutes are unconstitutional, (3) the financial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Lozano v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawrence E. Meyers, as Manager of the Ramon Burstyn Irrevocable Trust v. 8007 Burnet Holdings, LLC John Reese Nelson Magen Bullock Nelson Antonio Calvo J.M.N. Enterprises, LLC And 8007 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas, in Rem, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2020
- Philip Alan Green and Jonathan Zackhery Wilks v. Century Oak Wind Project, LLC; Engie North America, Inc.; And Blattner Energy, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024