Legal Opinion

People v. Dillard

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1982No. Docket 56038PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The majority accepts the statement of facts provided by Judge Knoblock in his dissenting opinion.

The arrest of defendant in his home after a warrantless entry by police officers was illegal. Defendant did not consent to the entry, nor were exigent circumstances present. Payton v New York, 445 US 573; 100 S Ct 1371; 63 L Ed 2d 639 (1980).

Defendant had a right to defend himself in resisting the unlawful arrest so long as the force used was reasonably necessary. People v Krum, *642374 Mich 356; 132 NW2d 69 (1965), cert den 381 US 935; 85 S Ct 1765; 14 L Ed 2d 699 (1965); Delude v Raasakka, 42…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. KrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. EisenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Delude v. RaasakkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People of Michigan v. Eric Arlington OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. People of Michigan v. Eric Arlington OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. People of Michigan v. Siwatu-Salama RaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. People v. ChatfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API