People v. Dillard
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The majority accepts the statement of facts provided by Judge Knoblock in his dissenting opinion.
The arrest of defendant in his home after a warrantless entry by police officers was illegal. Defendant did not consent to the entry, nor were exigent circumstances present. Payton v New York, 445 US 573; 100 S Ct 1371; 63 L Ed 2d 639 (1980).
Defendant had a right to defend himself in resisting the unlawful arrest so long as the force used was reasonably necessary. People v Krum, *642374 Mich 356; 132 NW2d 69 (1965), cert den 381 US 935; 85 S Ct 1765; 14 L Ed 2d 699 (1965); Delude v Raasakka, 42…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. KrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. EisenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Delude v. RaasakkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RobertsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People of Michigan v. Eric Arlington OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
- People of Michigan v. Eric Arlington OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
- People of Michigan v. Siwatu-Salama RaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- People v. ChatfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.