Legal Opinion
City of Daytona Beach v. Stansfield
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 23, 1972No. 41182PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Petition for certiorari by the City of Daytona Beach on certification as being of great public interest (without a specific certified question) brings before us for review the opinion of the First District *810Court of Appeal at 247 So.2d 753 (1971). The district court affirmed the trial judge’s final decree which found with the appellees (as a class of the city’s water customers in the area known as the South Peninsula, south of Frazar Road outside the limits of the City of Daytona Beach.) Fla.Const. art. V, § 4(2) F.S.A. and Rule 4.5(c), Fla. App. Rules, 32 F.S.A.
Appellees rely upon, and seek…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Gainesville v. Board of ControlSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Cooper v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Clay Utility Company v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- City of Clearwater v. BonseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Collins v. Pic-Town Water Works, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Landau v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Balzer v. Indian Lake Maintenance, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Jacksonville Electric Authority v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES v. CITY OF VERO BEACHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023