Legal Opinion

In re Richmond

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 24, 1945No. 5009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting all of appellant’s claims, 1 to 11, inclusive, and 13 to 15, inclusive, in his application for a patent for a method of treating and packaging dried fruit products. The applicant here appeals from the decision of the board and in this court withdraws the appeal as to claims 1, 2, 3, 8, and 10. We treat his so-called withdrawal as a motion to dismiss the appeal as to these claims, and the same will be granted. That leaves for our consideration claims 4 to 7, inclusive, 9, 11, and 13…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re JannellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  2. In re MattisonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of LangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API