Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 27, 1982No. [No. 68, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari filed in this case by Harvey Franklin Boyd presented the following question: "Did the Court of Special Appeals err in holding that the dismissal requirement of Article 27, § 616 E (Article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers) did not apply to the instant case because the instant indictment was not one contemplated by § 616 E (e)?”

The petition having been granted, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Boyd v. State, 51 Md. App. 197, 441 A.2d 1133 (1982) is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of that Court.

Judgment of the Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bunting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Painter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. State v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. State v. ChalkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Gillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API