Legal Opinion

State v. Hartog

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-383PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

At issue here is whether Iowa’s mandatory seat belt law is unconstitutional. The trial court held that it was not. We agree and affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

During the early morning hours of November 1, 1987, the defendant, John Har-tog, was stopped at a roadblock in Carter Lake, Iowa. The roadblock was jointly conducted by the Iowa State Patrol and local and county law enforcement agencies. An officer checked Hartog’s car for safety violations and found none. The officer did, however, issue Hartog a citation for failing to use his seat belt as required by Iowa…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. State v. Kirby Lenihan (071497)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. Norton v. Adair CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Sioux City Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Gravert v. NebergallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API