Legal Opinion

Royal Neighbors of America v. Heard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1916No. 5608. [fn*]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Tom Green County; J. W. Timmins, Judge. Suit by Blrs. Cora Heard and another against the Royal Neighbors of America. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.

Birs. Cora Heard, joined by her husband, T. Bl. Heard, brought this suit against the Royal Neighbors of America, a beneficiary association, doing business in Texas, upon a written contract of insurance for $1,000. Though duly served with citation, the defendant failed to answer, the plaintiffs obtained judgment by default, and the defendant has brought the case to this court by writ of error.

The plaintiff in error, defendant in the court below, presents but one assignment of error, which is that the trial court erred in rendering judgment by default in favor of the plaintiffs in the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newton v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Posey v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Jones v. HollidayTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Warren v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Bledsoe v. U. Bros. of Friendship Sis.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API