Hardy v. Moore County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge Wynn
dissenting.
I am compelled to dissent in this matter because I find that the defendants have failed to meet the requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-375 (1997). Specifically, I find that the defendants failed to exercise due diligence before resorting to publication as a means of providing plaintiff Nicholas Hardy with notice of the foreclosure proceedings against him.
As stated by the majority opinion, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-375 provides an in rem method of foreclosure to local taxing units. The notice provision of that statute requires the tax collector to inform the relevant party…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fountain v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Emanuel v. FellowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Barclays American/Mortgage Corp. v. BECA EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994