Legal Opinion

Stratman v. Andrus

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 2, 1979No. A76-132 CivilPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for the purpose of considering defendant’s motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. In this cause the plaintiffs, Burton and Stratman, challenge the eligibility of the Native village of Woody Island to make certain selections under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. § 1601-28 (1976).

In a previous memorandum and order of this court it was held that plaintiffs Stratman and Burton, who are holders of federal grazing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. KODIAK-ALEUTIAN CHAPTER OF ALASKA, ETC. v. KleppeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stratman v. Leisnoi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Stratman v. Leisnoi IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API