In re Bergy
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1DissentMiller, Judge
I do not agree that a biologically pure culture of microorganisms is within the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101 intended by Congress.
The board majority concluded—
[35 U.S.C. 101] does not specifically proscribe patents on plants, yet it was found necessary to enact a special section in order to reward horticulturalists and agriculturalists (35 U.S.C., Chapter 15, Sections 161-164). If 35 U.S.C. 101 were to be broadly construed there would clearly not have been any necessity for Chapter 15 of 35 U.S.C.
We are especially impressed by the legislative history of R.S. 4886 (U.S.C. Title 35, Section 31),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bobsee Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.