Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stockinger v. Zeilberger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 2014No. 14-0550Published

1DissentRothenberg, J.

Anna Hammerschmid Stockinger (“Stockinger”), Elsa Haider (“Haider”), and Gertrude Kuhtreiber (“Kuhtreiber”) (collectively, “the Petitioners”) seek certio-rari review of the trial court’s order (“Order”) finding that Stockinger’s and Haider’s claims cannot proceed because they are medically incapable of traveling from Austria to Miami for depositions and that Kuhtreiber, who the trial court found was medically able to travel, must appear in Miami for depositions within forty-five days if she wishes to proceed on her claim. Because the Order departs from the essential requirements of law and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Ham v. DunmireSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Board of Regents of State v. SnyderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Poston v. WigginsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Toll v. KorgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API