State v. Hoskins

LANSING, Chief Judge.

In this appeal Tommy Hoskins asserts that the consecutive sentences he received for two counts of drawing a cheek without funds are excessive and should have been reduced by the trial court when the court revoked Hos-kins’ probation or that the court should have granted Hoskins’ motion under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 for reduction of his sentences. We conclude that the consecutive sentences are excessive in the circumstances of this case and modify the sentences accordingly.

BACKGROUND

Hoskins pleaded guilty to two counts of drawing a check without funds, I.C. § 18-3106(a).…