Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship of Snodgrass

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1997No. 96-CA-00068-SCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATHER, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

At issue in this case is a motion to “uncon-solidate”, which the appellants filed as guardians of a minor child. Basically, the appellants wanted the Hinds County Chancery Court to assign the guardianship ease of this minor to a different division within that court. After filing the motion to “un-consolidate”, the appellants were replaced as guardians by agreement. Subsequently, the chancellor dismissed the motion to “uncon-solidate”, and this appeal was filed.

The appellants request that this Court dictate to the Hinds County Chancery Court which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grey v. GreyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of MasonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Demyers v. DemyersMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Blakeney v. McReeMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Carla Speights Darnell v. William Duff DarnellMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Clement Alleyne v. Theodore JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Leighann Gonzalez v. Coastal Industrial Contractors, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API