Legal Opinion

Barden v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J„), entered on or about October 10, 2000, which denied petitioner correction officer’s application to annul respondents’ determination denying petitioner an accidental disability retirement pension pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 507-a (b) (3), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Medical Board’s conclusions, that petitioner is not physically disabled from continuing his duties as a correction officer, and that while he is psychiatrically disabled, the disability is not causally related to any line of duty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Reid v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mulheren v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Matter of Fusco v. Teachers' Retirement Sys. of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Matter of DeMeo v. Teachers Retirement Sys. of the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Corso v. JaloskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Drummond v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API