Legal Opinion

Moore v. Does 1 to 25

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1995No. 94-531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Daniel E. Moore and Delores Moore brought this action for legal malpractice in the District Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County. The court granted defendant Court E. Ball’s motion for summary judgment. The Moores appeal. We affirm.

The issue is whether the court erred in ruling that this action requires expert testimony and in granting summary judgment on the basis of the Moores’ failure to produce such testimony.

In January 1990, Donna Rostad and her daughters Deborah Birchell and Kathleen Riter (sellers) agreed in writing to sell the “Country Pride” restaurant in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carlson v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lorash v. EpsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lueck v. United Parcel ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Babcock Place Ltd. Partnership v. Berg, Lilly, Andriolo & Tollefsen, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rafes v. RateMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Babcock Place Ltd. Partnership v. Berg, Lilly, Andriolo & Tollefsen, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API