Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Skiles

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1933No. 11529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Justice.

Appellees’ motion to affirm on certificate must be denied. The record shows that, at the time the motion was filed, April 25, 1933, appellants had abandoned their appeal, which had been perfected on January 23, 1933, had sued out in the trial court a petition for writ of error, and had duly filed their super-sedeas writ of error bond. The petition for writ of error and the supersedeas writ of *1017error bond' were filed April 4, 1933. Appellant has sixty days from the date of the service of citation in error within which to prepare and file a transcript and statement of facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harding v. City of RaymondvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Reef v. HamblenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Hawkeye Securities Ins. v. CashionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bond BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. BradyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API