Schaefer v. Ropes
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to dismiss complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegelberg, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint upon the plaintiff’s failure to file a bill of particulars as required by section 2 of chapter 944 of the Laws of 1920. The action is .for the recovery of the reasonable value of the use and occupation by the defendant of an apartment after the expiration of her term under a prior written lease. The plaintiff claims that the statutory obligation to file a bill of particulars is limited to actions where the rent is fixed by agreement of the parties. I do not agree with this contention. In my opinion the bill of particulars is required in every case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Preston v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Castle v. ArmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Castle v. . ArmsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Famborille v. Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thackray v. RitzNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- 48 Vesey Street Corp. v. StraussCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
- Petro, Inc. v. SerioNew York Supreme Court · 2005