Legal Opinion

Long Island Insurance v. Maldonado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*976Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Martuseello, J J., concur; Munder, J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: I am constrained to concur by reason -of our prior ruling in Matter of State-Wide Ins. Co. (Lopez) (30 A D 2d 694), although I disagree with the conclusion there reached that service of an application to stay arbitration upon the attorney who served the demand for arbitration is ineffective to acquire jurisdiction over the party in whose behalf the attorney served the demand. I am in accord with the following expression by Mr. Justice Eager in his dissenting opinion…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yak Taxi, Inc. v. TekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API