Legal Opinion

United States v. Conard (In Re Conard)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 12, 1980No. 19-40021PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MERRITT S. DEITZ, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

For the first time under the new Bankruptcy Code we are asked to consider “undue hardship” as an affirmative defense in a suit seeking to have a federally-guaranteed student loan excepted from discharge.

Section 523(a) of the Code provides that a bankruptcy discharge will not extend:(8) to a governmental unit, or a nonprofit institution of higher education, for an educational loan, unless .

(B) excepting such debt from discharge under this paragraph will impose an undue hardship on the debtor.

Before examining the facts of the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connecticut Student Loan Foundation, Inc. v. Bagley (In Re Bagley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1980
  2. Matter of FonzoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. Webb (In Re Webb)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  2. Lezer v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp. (In Re Lezer)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1982
  3. Sands v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (In Re Sands)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  4. Ballard v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Education Assistance Authority (In Re Ballard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
  5. Ford v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp. (In Re Ford)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API