Legal Opinion
Poll v. Administrator
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 10, 1984No. File 23741PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This is an appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 31-249b from the denial of federal trade readjustment allowances by the defendant, the Administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act.
The Trade Act of 1974; 19 U.S.C. $ 2101 et seq.; provides federally funded benefits, which are in addition to state unemployment compensation, to workers who are permanently or temporarily laid off because of foreign competition. See International Union, United Auto, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Donovan, 554 F. Sup. 1172 (D.D.C. 1983); Woodrum v. Donovan, 544 F. Sup. 202, 203 (Ct.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Guevara v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Oralee D. Lloyd v. U. S. Department of Labor, Elaine Abts Shirley Mitchell Corine Howarter Alice v. Smith and Shirley A. Smith v. U. S. Department of Labor, Keith R. Klemme v. U. S. Department of Labor, Valorie Anne Repka v. U. S. Department of Labor, King Fox, Clarence Domingo, Warren S. Short and Robert Stevenson, on Behalf of a Group of Kaiser Steel Corporation Workers, Napa, California v. United States Department of Labor, Harold A. Bratt, Harry J. Gilman and Marvin FooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- Poll v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985