Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1990No. B14-88-00419-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Geneva Kirk Brooks has filed a motion for rehearing alleging we erred in refusing to allow her to file a statement of facts and in refusing to consider fundamental errors shown in the transcript. James Brooks responds by asserting that appellant’s points on rehearing have no merit and that appellant brought this appeal without sufficient cause and for delay purposes only. We find no merit in appellant’s points and further find that appellant has pursued a frivolous appeal for purposes of delay only. We overrule appellant’s motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perry v. Kroger Stores, Store No. 119, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Ward v. LubojaskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. S.B. & T. Gem Imports, Inc. v. Creswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Grocers Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Ashcreek Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc. v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. Jose Chavez v. Juan Francisco Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API