Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Rosenkrans

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 1925No. 11,092PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Defendant in error, plaintiff below, as administratrix of the estate of a deceased person, recovered in trover from defendant, now plaintiff in error, for the value of certain choses in action alleged to have been obtained by divers means from decedent during his life time and con verted by defendant to her own use. Exemplary damages were also awarded. She brings the case here on error.

Counsel for plaintiff in error at the oral argument stated that the sole question to be determined is whether such an action is one that survives to an executor or administrator, and this is all that we shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeFord v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  2. Portland Gold Min. Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. United Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Bond v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Allen v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Worrie v. BozeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  5. Micheletti v. MoidelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API