Legal Opinion

Feldheim v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 22, 1949No. 53577; protest 140184-K (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The instant protest raises the question of the proper classification for duty purposes of certain books imported from England by mail. The books, entitled “Essays Presented to J. H. Hertz, Chief Rabbi” of Great Britain were *173classified under paragraph 1410 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753, as all other books, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem. It was claimed in the protest “that the books should be classified for duty at '734 % under paragraph 1410 as books of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bryant & BeineckeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Godillot v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Thornley & Pitt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Tice v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API