State v. Koslik
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
977 A.2d 275 (2009)
116 Conn.App. 693
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Richard KOSLIK.
No. 29673.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Argued April 28, 2009.
Decided September 1, 2009.
Jodi Zils Gagne, for the appellant (defendant).
Joseph Rubin, associate attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellee (state).
DiPENTIMA, ROBINSON and ALVORD, Js.
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Richard Koslik, appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, he claims that his sentence is illegal because the term of probation exceeds the permissible…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.