Legal Opinion

State v. Koslik

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 1, 2009No. AC 29673Published

1Opinion of the Court

977 A.2d 275 (2009)

116 Conn.App. 693

STATE of Connecticut

v.

Richard KOSLIK.

No. 29673.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued April 28, 2009.

Decided September 1, 2009.

Jodi Zils Gagne, for the appellant (defendant).

Joseph Rubin, associate attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellee (state).

DiPENTIMA, ROBINSON and ALVORD, Js.

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant, Richard Koslik, appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, he claims that his sentence is illegal because the term of probation exceeds the permissible…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API