Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ames v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1990No. 89-2295Published

1DissentW. Sharp, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my view, Ames should survive the summary judgment, based on this record, and be allowed to present two issues of disputed fact to the jury: was he wrongfully discharged by his employer, and was he entitled to be paid severance pay upon termination? True, Ames had no written contract. But he clearly had an oral contract which was mutually honored and performed for a period in excess of seven years.

In his affidavit filed in opposition to the summary judgment motion, Ames said he had been told he would be entitled to severance pay and other benefits, as spelled out in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Pan American Bancshares, Inc. v. TraskDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Burton v. KeatonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Greene v. Kolpac Builders, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Strahm v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API