St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Spradley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.
Appellee bad, for five years, occupied a building in tlie city of Van Burén, dimensions of wbicb were 26 by 70 feet. There were two partitions. In October, 1937, appellee purchased the property. He operated a liquor store, beauty shop, and barber shop. Complaint was filed June 15, 1938, with trial December 6 of the same year.
Appellant’s railway was constructed in 1882. Between the railway and a street crossing there are buildings other than appellee’s.
Averment of the complaint is that appellee’s premises were overflowed because of the negligence of appellants; that at such flood times…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Jones v. . CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Trustee v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Sumlin v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Ishie v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. PaullDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. R. C. Paull, Virginia Paull and Paull's Hatchery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.