Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 1999No. 41584-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

— At issue are the timeliness and sufficiency of a claim for damaged and lost household goods that Jerry and Tricia Schwartz submitted to Atlas Van Lines, a moving and storage company. Because the Schwartzes timely and substantially complied with the claim-filing requirements with respect to certain household goods, but failed to comply with the requirements as to others, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.

In 1990, the Schwartzes contracted in California with an agent of Atlas to pack and store their household goods until completion of construction of their new…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Certain Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds of London v. United Parcel Service of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API