State v. Adicho
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
LEESON, J. pro tempore
Defendant appeals his conviction for custodial interference in the second degree. ORS 163.245. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the state presented insufficient evidence that he knowingly kept a 14-year-old juvenile, T, from her lawful custodian. We affirm.
In reviewing the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, accepting reasonable inferences and credibility choices that the factfinder could have made. State v. Presley, 175 Or App 439,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DirksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978