Legal Opinion
Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge Lanham
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1969No. 25148PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
The motion for rehearing en banc initiated by a member of the Court in regular active service is denied, a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12).
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Larry Dickinson and Gibbs AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Daniel J. McDougall Jr. v. Kenneth R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- In Re Roger NovakCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Petroleos Mexicanos v. Crawford Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 929, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8335 George B. Sanders v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.