Legal Opinion

Travelers' Insurance v. Stiles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirsohbbrg, J.:

On May 18, 1900, the plaintiff, a foreign insurance corporation, authorized to transact business in this State, entered into a written agreement with James B. Pugh, whereby he was constituted its agent to solicit insurance at the city of Mount Vernon. The agreement was prepared by the plaintiff, and it provided for his payment by commissions at various rates upon the .business which he should succeed in securing. It further provided that in consideration of such commissions, which were guaranteed by the plaintiff to equal $ 125-montlily, he would furnish and maintain an office…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Amicable Mutual Life Insurance v. SedgwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Socialistic Co-operative Pub. Ass'n v. HoffmannNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daly v. OldUtah Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API