Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 16, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from■ Johnson District Court. — Hon. S. H. Fairall, Judge. Action to recover damages for an alleged breach, of an obligation to maintain certain fences and railway-crossings. After all the evidence was submitted in the court below, the jury were instructed to return a verdict for defendant, which was done. Judgment was rendered on the verdict, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— In the year 1868, the plaintiff executed and delivered to the Cedar Rapids & Burlington Railway Company a deed for the right of way across a farm then and now owned by him. The grantee and another company were subsequently consolidated, under the name of the Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Minnesota Railway Company. This company, by the consolidation, acquired all the rights conveyed by the deed, and built a railroad over the right of way thereby conveyed. It also executed a deed- of trust to secure payment of construction bonds. This deed was foreclosed, and the road sold to defendant, and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Close v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Swan v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madison v. Garfield Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Cox v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fleming v. StearnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Yount v. CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Hunter v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API