Legal Opinion

Penson v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 7, 1969No. C.D. 3877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The protests listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, consolidated for the purpose of trial, contest the classification of certain Japanese silk keba under the provisions of paragraph 1201, Tariff Act of 1930, as silk, partially manufactured. As a consequence of said classification, duty was assessed at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff herein contends the merchandise is properly entitled to entry free of duty under the provisions of paragraph 1762, Tariff Act of 1930, as silk waste. Alternatively, plaintiff contends that if the merchandise is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woolart Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API