Holladay v. State

The party assaulted was a qualified member of the panel of jurors serving for the week of the court during which this defendant was tried. The point is made in various ways that the defendant’s ease should not be tried before the jurors impaneled with the prosecutor. All motions of defendant based upon that fact were overruled. There is nothing to show that defendant’s case was prejudiced by being tried before a jury selected from the jurors serving for the week. The matter of a continuance was within the sound discretion of the court, not to be revised on appeal except in eases of abuse.…