County Bank v. Greenberg
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion in this case and in that rendered upon the former appeal, in 116 Cal. 467.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
The defendant Schwartz appeals from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying a new trial. The case was here on a former appeal (County Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Greenberg, 116 Cal. 467), wherein will he found a statement of the facts.
1. On the return of the case to the trial court the complaint was amended so as to make it show that Greenberg Brothers, between the making and delivery of the note on which the suit is based and the time it was due, March 5, 1895, had overdrawn their account with plaintiff to an amount considerable in excess of the note; that said note…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Carver v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Vandewater v. McRaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- County Bank of San Luis Obispo County v. GreenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schehr v. BerkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Méndez v. NussaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1907
- Chiques v. PoloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1909
- Gandía & Co. v. AlonsoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
- Gandía y Compañía v. AlonsoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.