Danny Calamaco v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JIM R. WRIGHT, CHIEF JUSTICE
The jury convicted Danny Calamaco of murder. The trial court found two enhancement paragraphs to be true and assessed Appellant’s punishment at confinement for life. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (West 2011). We affirm.
Appellant presents three issues on appeal. In his first issue, Appellant contends that the trial court denied him his right to counsel during voir dire. Appellant asserts in his second issue that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. And, in his third issue, Appellant argues that the trial court denied him the right to a fair…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Wayne Ford v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
- HUGGINS, NOEL CHRISTOPHER v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2023
- Hector Jose Subia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2017
- Robert Rubalcado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015