Legal Opinion

In re Sutherland

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 9, 1928No. 89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The decree entered below directed the Eastman Kodak Company and the Lineoln-Allianee Bank to cancel shares of common stock of the former, and to issue and deliver to the Alien Property Custodian new certificates in lieu thereof, and directed the Security Trust Company of Rochester to countersign and register said certificates, and- further ordered that the Alien Property Custodian recover from the appellant all dividends declared' on the stock since -October 1, 1925.

*597On April 1,1918, the Yereinigte Fahriken Photographiseher Papiere, of Dresden, Germany, appeared on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Hopper v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ScatenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Mayer v. Chase National Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Estate of SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Thoms v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API