Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Rowe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 22, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 139-49Published

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Judge.

Defendant filed a motion to have ■ the plaintiff adjudicated in contempt of Court for failure to comply with an order for maintenance entered in this case on May-17, 1950 and for a money judgment for ar-rearage due under said order.

Plaintiff originally brought this action to-annul the marriage relation of the parties. Judgment for annulment of the marriage was entered; the defendant was awarded custody of the two minor children, and plaintiff was ordered to pay $75.00 a month for the support and maintenance of the-children. This order was entered on May 17, 1950.

Plaintiff opposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emrich v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Wedderburn v. WedderburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  3. Slack v. PerrineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Moran v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API