Legal Opinion

Local 363, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. New York State Department of Labor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peters, J.

Prior to June 1995, respondent utilized different prevailing wage schedules for voice telecommunications work and data telecommunications work performed pursuant to a public work contract {see, NY Const, art I, § 17; Labor Law art 8). Where the work involved the installation of data cable, the prevailing rate of pay was the electrician rate as determined in accordance with collective bargaining agreements between various local unions affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (hereinafter IBEW) and their signatory employers. For work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Monarch Electrical Contracting Corp. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Siera Telcom Services, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Onondaga-Cortland-Madison Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. New York Independent Contractors Alliance v. LiuNew York Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API