Legal Opinion
United States v. Woodlee (James)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1998No. 97-7032, 97-7033 and 97-7034PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
These three appeals arise from the same racially charged incident; therefore, we join them for the purpose of this opinion. James Woodlee appeals his conviction for violent interference with federally protected activity, contending: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the court erred during sentencing; (3) the court erred when it allowed testimony regarding prior conduct; and (4) the government’s Brady and Jencks Act violations warrant a new trial. Gary Woodlee raises similar sufficiency of the evidence and sentencing arguments.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. ChanthadaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lemrick Nelson, Jr. And Charles Price, Also Known as Bald Black ManCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Damon Causey, United States of America v. Paul Hardy, Also Known as P, Also Known as Cool and Len DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.