Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1979No. 50,274PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foth, C.J.:

Defendant was convicted by a jury of possession of marijuana with intent to sell. K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 65-4127b(¿). On appeal he contends the evidence was insufficient to establish his intent to sell.

Intent, like any element of a crime, may be shown by acts, circumstances and inferences deducible therefrom. State v. Faulkner, 220 Kan. 153, Syl. ¶ 13, 551 P.2d 1247 (1976); State v. Evans, 219 Kan. 515, 519-20, 548 P.2d 772 (1976). The standard for appellate review where the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged has recently been reformulated in State v. Voiles, 226 Kan. 469, Syl. ¶…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. State v. VoilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. KingsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. O'CAMPOIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. EisemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API