Legal Opinion
Burling v. Schroeder Hotel Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The plaintiff, PI. R. Burling, hereinafter referred to as the “respondent,” while a guest at the Schroeder Hotel, owned and operated by the Schroeder Hotel Company, on March 18, 1934, suffered an injury as the result of a fall on a stairway in the hotel. An action for damages was brought against the Plotel Company and, on the trial, a special verdict was rendered in his favor. On motions after verdict, the court changed one of the jury’s findings and ordered judgment dismissing the action. From the judgment so entered, plaintiff appealed. This court reversed the judgment and remanded cause…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Foust v. Munson Steamship LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bumgarner v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Bumgarner v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953