Heintz v. Woodson

Appellant sought to quash an execution sale of his interest in certain real estate due to respondent’s failure to comply with the requirements of Rules 76.17 and 43.-01(g). The trial court overruled appellant’s motion to quash; the Eastern District affirmed. We granted transfer and have jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 10. Affirmed. 1

I

Following the dissolution of their marriage in 1979, a dispute arose between respondent and appellant over the latter’s liability for payments made by respondent and her parents to prevent foreclosure on the couple’s former marital home. After a protracted…