Legal Opinion · Dissent

Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 2013No. 1D12-3563Published

1DissentWetherell, J.

I dissent.

The judge of compensation claims (JCC) found that Westphal was not yet at maximum medical improvement (MMI) and this finding is supported by competent substantial evidence. Thus, under the rule announced in City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald, 710 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and reaffirmed by the en banc court less than two years ago in Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley, 78 So.3d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), in order to obtain permanent total disability (PTD) benefits, Westphal had the burden to prove that (1) he was totally disabled when his 104 weeks of temporary total…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API