Legal Opinion
Crisonino v. New York City Housing Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 1997No. 96 Civ. 9742(HB)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BAER, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment on plaintiffs federal claims and for dismissal of the pendant state-law claims. For the reasons discussed below the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Elizabeth Crisonino was employed as an architect by defendant New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”) from January 23, 1995 until her termination on January 19,1996. She was called to jury duty in this Court on or about November 20, 1995 and was chosen to serve on a criminal trial expected to last two months. Plaintiff notified NYCHA of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Alexander v. Westbury Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Liu v. StriuliDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.