Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Henry.' Floyd superior court. June 9, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
1. A judgment overruling a demurrer to an answer, unless excepted to and reversed, concludes the plaintiff as to the legal sufficiency of theanswer; andif the samegoes to the wholeof the plaintiff’s demand and is duly supported by evidence, a complete defense is established.
2. Applying this rule to the evidence appearing in the record, the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.
3. No material error of law was committed by the court below, and the newly discovered evidence presents no cause for a neiy trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Watson v. LumsdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Kiser Co. v. McLean, Everett & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Piedmont Hospital v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933